Describe Holmes and Rahe’s (1967) Social Readjustment Rating Scale (Srrs) and Describe to What Extent It Is a Valid Taxonomy of the Causes of Stress

Depict Holmes and Rahe’s (1967) Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS) and portray how much it is a substantial scientific classification of the reasons for pressure. The main five upsetting occasions, which can occur in an individual’s life, are sorted as ‘death of a spouse’, ‘divorce’, ‘martial separation’, ‘jail term’, and ‘death of a nearby family member’. Additionally, occasions, for example, ‘vacation’ and ‘change in eating habits’ are viewed as minor life changes on the scale. Every occasion is ascribed to a discretionary worth or ‘LCU’ (Life Change Units) going from one to a hundred. From this, an individual is given an aggregate score dependent on the entirety of the unpleasant occasions which have transpired over the earlier year. Individuals with an aggregate of between 200 and 300 life change units should create significant medical issues. Individuals scoring more than one hundred units are probably going to endure a moderate time of sick wellbeing (Holmes and Rahe, 1967). It tends to be said that there is a significant predisposition in a portion of the things on the rundown of life occasions, preferring grown-ups over more youthful people. Obviously, youngsters experience the ill effects of pressure, yet it is unconvincing to contend that they have to adapt to events, for example, ‘death of a spouse’, ‘divorce’ or ‘marital separation’ and almost certainly, they won't find ‘vacation’ unpleasant yet the direct inverse. It likewise ought to be noticed that distressing occasions including ‘exams pressures’ and ‘concerns about weight or appearance’ are excluded from the forty-three life occasions, and these can be extensively upsetting for more youthful individuals. This repeats the way that a few things should be added to the model, for this scale to be increasingly generalisable in describing the reasons for pressure. References

PEST Analysis for Bank Muscat Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Irritation Analysis for Bank Muscat - Essay Example 1. History and development of Bank Muscat The Bank Muscat is a business bank of Oman, established on 30th April 1982. It has solid operational nearness in divisions including corporate banking, venture banking, retail banking, and private banking. Right now, the Bank Muscat is the biggest financial system in Oman with more than 130 branches and resources worth more than US$18 billion (Bank Muscat). It has nearness in abroad nations including Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait with a branch each and has a delegate office in Dubai and UAE. The Bank Muscat is by and large consistently evaluated as the ‘best bank in Oman’ in the course of the most recent quite a while and it has been granted the Hewitt acknowledgment as ‘the Middle East’s Best Employer 2009’ (Hewitt 2009). 2. Nuisance investigation of the organization The PEST examination is a potential instrument to dissect the large scale financial condition of a business industry. This device can be util ized to survey the market for the Bank Muscat. Political components The political structure of Oman is as a flat out government where the Sultan of Oman goes about as the head of government just as head of state (Al-Azri 2012, p.1). The court framework in Oman has three levels including Elementary Court (most reduced level), the Court of Appeal (center level), and the Supreme Court (most elevated level). Since Oman is a flat out government, it has clear long haul strategies with respect to the financial advancement in the nation. The ongoing worldwide downturn has convinced the Sultanate of Oman to concentrate more on practical financial turn of events. Along these lines, the Oman government significantly bolsters Bank Muscat’s endeavors to reinforce its market position and to grow its financial business. The solid government help profited the Bank Muscat to turn into the primary organization from Oman to be recorded on the London Stock Exchange. Moreover, Oman keeps up bette r political relations with US and India; and this quality is probably going to add to the Bank Muscat’s future development. Affordable variables Oman is a Middle East nation which has been accomplishing noteworthy GDP per capita development rates for the past 50 years (Gonzalez 2008, p.154). The nation has huge oil and gaseous petrol stores and they have all the earmarks of being the fundamental wellspring of incomes for the nation. As studies show, the extreme modernization endeavors taken by Oman to improve its people’s expectations for everyday comforts and to accomplish a critical situation in the worldwide commercial center are likewise advancing the activities of the Bank Muscat. Since Oman is one of the Middle East nations with no national obligation, financial specialists see Oman as a steady economy and they are eager to put resources into the nation (Doing business in Oman). This positive financial circumstance significantly helps the Bank Muscat to achieve t he trust of speculators and consequently to advance their financial tasks without any problem. As of the quarter finished on 31st March 2009, the net benefits of the Bank Muscat about multiplied to â€Å"OMR 48.42 million from OMR 26.54 million in 1Q08 (GCC First response paper 2009). At long last, serious financing cost set by the Bank Muscat would shield the premiums of its customers and the circumstance thusly may help the bank to raise gigantic working assets. Altogether, the country’s monetary range offers a prosperous future for the association. Social elements With the disappointment of various banks over the globe, Oman’

Blog Archive Consider a Part-Time MBAor an MBA Program in Europe!

Blog Archive Consider a Part-Time MBAâ€"or an MBA Program in Europe! We at mbaMission often receive questions about part-time MBA programs, so we thought we should offer a look at some of the pros and cons of this option. As for the pros, the one that business school candidates cite most frequently is that the part-time MBA involves a limited opportunity cost. Unlike a full-time MBA student, a part-time one does not miss out on two years of salary (and, in some cases, retirement savings) and can still earn raises and promotions while completing his/her studies. Furthermore, firm sponsorship seems to be more prevalent for part-time MBAs, so candidates who have this option can truly come out ahead, with a free education and continued earning throughout. Beyond the financial rationale, many part-time MBA students see an academic advantage; they can learn both in the classroom and at work and can then turn theory into practice (and vice versa) in real time, on an ongoing basis. Of course, a cynic might add that another pro is that part-time MBA programs are generally less selective. So a candidate who may have had difficulty getting accepted to a traditional two-year program may have a better chance of ga ining admission to a well-regarded school in its part-time program instead. As for the cons, many part-time MBA candidates feel that the comparative lack of structure means that networking opportunities within the class are limited. While one part-time student could complete a school’s MBA program in two years, another might complete it in five. As a result, with candidates progressing through the program at such different paces, students will not likely see each other regularly in the same classes or at social events. In addition, in a traditional MBA environment, academics always come first; in a part-time environment, work typically comes first, and academics must come second or even third, after family. In other words, the full-time program generally involves greater intensity with regard to the classroom experience, given that it is the focal point of students’ lives. Another thing to consider is that some MBA programs do not offer their “star” faculty to part-time studentsâ€"something that candidates should definitely ask about before enrolling â€"and offer limited access to on-grounds recruiting. Of course, we are not trying to offer a definitive “answer” or present a bias for a particular kind of program; we are simply sharing some objective facts for candidates to consider as they make informed choices for themselves. MBA candidates looking to broaden their business school choices could also consider European programs. Although many applicants who are competing for places at the top U.S. business schools are well aware of the strengths of the MBA programs at INSEAD and London Business School, even more options are available beyond these two, including  IESE,  ESADE,  Oxford (Said), and  Cambridge (Judge). These four schools in particular have been aggressively playing “catch-up” with their better-known brethren by raising funds and dedicating them to scholarships and to enhancing their global brands. Other candidates may also be aware that  IMD  offers a boutique MBA program with remarkable international diversity, highly regarded academics, and a strong reputation with international employers. So, numerous options are available, and each can be explored on its own academic merit. But is earning your MBA in Europe, in itself, a good choice for you? For many applicants, the key issue is where they would like to be  after  completing their education. If you hope to work in Europe, these schools clearly offer an advantage over all but the top five or six U.S. schoolsâ€"Harvard Business School, for example, can probably open as many doors in Europe as INSEAD can. However, if you hope to work in the States, the European schools will not provide the pipeline of opportunities that a top-ranked American school could, particularly for candidates who are targeting a niche industry or a company that is not a well-known international brand. Still, beyond the employment picture, studying abroad offers intrinsic value. Spending two years in London, Fontainebleau, or Lausanne could certainly be its own reward. For more information on various international business schools, including INSEAD, Cambridge Judge, and IMD, check out our free  mbaMission Program Primers. Share ThisTweet International Business Schools Blog Archive Consider a Part-Time MBAâ€"or an MBA Program in Europe! We at mbaMission often receive questions about part-time MBA programs, so we thought we should offer a look at some of the pros and cons of this option. As for the pros, the one that business school candidates cite most frequently is that the part-time MBA involves a limited opportunity cost. Unlike a full-time MBA student, a part-time one does not miss out on two years of salary (and, in some cases, retirement savings) and can still earn raises and promotions while completing his/her studies. Furthermore, firm sponsorship seems to be more prevalent for part-time MBAs, so candidates who have this option can truly come out ahead, with a free education and continued earning throughout. Beyond the financial rationale, many part-time MBA students see an academic advantage; they can learn both in the classroom and at work and can then turn theory into practice (and vice versa) in real time, on an ongoing basis. Of course, a cynic might add that another pro is that part-time MBA programs are generally less selective. So a candidate who may have had difficulty getting accepted to a traditional two-year program may have a better chance of ga ining admission to a well-regarded school in its part-time program instead. As for the cons, many part-time MBA candidates feel that the comparative lack of structure means that networking opportunities within the class are limited. While one part-time student could complete a school’s MBA program in two years, another might complete it in five. As a result, with candidates progressing through the program at such different paces, students will not likely see each other regularly in the same classes or at social events. In addition, in a traditional MBA environment, academics always come first; in a part-time environment, work typically comes first, and academics must come second or even third, after family. In other words, the full-time program generally involves greater intensity with regard to the classroom experience, given that it is the focal point of students’ lives. Another thing to consider is that some MBA programs do not offer their “star” faculty to part-time studentsâ€"something that candidates should definitely ask about before enrolling â€"and offer limited access to on-grounds recruiting. Of course, we are not trying to offer a definitive “answer” or present a bias for a particular kind of program; we are simply sharing some objective facts for candidates to consider as they make informed choices for themselves. MBA candidates looking to broaden their business school choices could also consider European programs. Although many applicants who are competing for places at the top U.S. business schools are well aware of the strengths of the MBA programs at INSEAD and London Business School, even more options are available beyond these two, including  IESE,  ESADE,  Oxford (Said), and  Cambridge (Judge). These four schools in particular have been aggressively playing “catch-up” with their better-known brethren by raising funds and dedicating them to scholarships and to enhancing their global brands. Those who know their business schools are also aware that  IMD  offers a boutique MBA program with remarkable international diversity, very highly regarded academics, and a stellar reputation with international employers. So, numerous options are available, and each can be explored on its own academic merit, but is earning your MBA in Europe, in itself, a good choice for you? For many, the key issue in determining this is where they would like to be  after  completing their education. If you are seeking to work in Europe, then clearly, these schools offer an advantage over all but the top five or six schools in the United Statesâ€"Harvard Business School, for example, can probably open as many doors in Europe as INSEAD can. However, if you are seeking to work in the States, then the European schools will not provide the pipeline of opportunities that a top-ranked American school could provide, particularly for those who hope to work in a niche industry or with a company that is not a well-known international brand. Still, beyond the employment picture, studying abroad offers intrinsic value. Spending two years in London, Fontainebleau, or Lausanne could certainly be its own reward. For more information on various international business schools, including INSEAD, Cambridge Judge, and IMD, check out the new free  mbaMission Program Primers. Share ThisTweet Application Tips B-School Facts B-Schools Outside the Top 15 Cambridge Judge Business School ESADE IE Business School IESE Business School International Business Schools Blog Archive Consider a Part-Time MBAâ€"or an MBA Program in Europe! We at mbaMission often receive questions about part-time MBA programs, so we thought we should offer a look at some of the pros and cons of this option. As for the pros, the one that business school candidates cite most frequently is that the part-time MBA involves a limited opportunity cost. Unlike a full-time MBA student, a part-time one does not miss out on two years of salary (and, in some cases, retirement savings) and can still earn raises and promotions while completing his/her studies. Furthermore, firm sponsorship seems to be more prevalent for part-time MBAs, so candidates who have this option can truly come out ahead, with a free education and continued earning throughout. Beyond the financial rationale, many part-time MBA students see an academic advantage; they can learn both in the classroom and at work and can then turn theory into practice (and vice versa) in real time, on an ongoing basis. Of course, a cynic might add that another pro is that part-time MBA programs are generally less selective. So a candidate who may have had difficulty getting accepted to a traditional two-year program may have a better chance of ga ining admission to a well-regarded school in its part-time program instead. As for the cons, many part-time MBA candidates feel that the comparative lack of structure means that networking opportunities within the class are limited. While one part-time student could complete a school’s MBA program in two years, another might complete it in five. As a result, with candidates progressing through the program at such different paces, students will not likely see each other regularly in the same classes or at social events. In addition, in a traditional MBA environment, academics always come first; in a part-time environment, work typically comes first, and academics must come second or even third, after family. In other words, the full-time program generally involves greater intensity with regard to the classroom experience, given that it is the focal point of students’ lives. Another thing to consider is that some MBA programs do not offer their “star” faculty to part-time studentsâ€"something that candidates should definitely ask about before enrolling â€"and offer limited access to on-grounds recruiting. Of course, we are not trying to offer a definitive “answer” or present a bias for a particular kind of program; we are simply sharing some objective facts for candidates to consider as they make informed choices for themselves. MBA candidates looking to broaden their business school choices could also consider European programs. Although many applicants who are competing for places at the top U.S. business schools are well aware of the strengths of the MBA programs at INSEAD and London Business School, even more options are available beyond these two, including  IESE,  ESADE,  Oxford (Said), and  Cambridge (Judge). These four schools in particular have been aggressively playing “catch-up” with their better-known brethren by raising funds and dedicating them to scholarships and to enhancing their global brands. Those who know their business schools are also aware that  IMD  offers a boutique MBA program with remarkable international diversity, very highly regarded academics, and a stellar reputation with international employers. So, numerous options are available, and each can be explored on its own academic merit. But is earning your MBA in Europe, in itself, a good choice for you? For many, the key issue in determining this is where they would like to be  after  completing their education. If you are seeking to work in Europe, then clearly, these schools offer an advantage over all but the top five or six schools in the United Statesâ€"Harvard Business School, for example, can probably open as many doors in Europe as INSEAD can. However, if you are seeking to work in the States, then the European schools will not provide the pipeline of opportunities that a top-ranked American school could provide, particularly for those who hope to work in a niche industry or with a company that is not a well-known international brand. Still, beyond the employment picture, studying abroad offers intrinsic value. Spending two years in London, Fontainebleau, or Lausanne could certainly be its own reward. For more information on various international business schools, including INSEAD, Cambridge Judge, and IMD, check out the free  mbaMission Program Primers. Share ThisTweet Cambridge Judge Business School ESADE IESE Business School Saïd Business School Blog Archive Consider a Part-Time MBAâ€"or an MBA Program in Europe! We at mbaMission often receive questions about part-time MBA programs, so we thought we should offer a look at some of the pros and cons of this option. As for the pros, the one that business school candidates cite most frequently is that the part-time MBA involves a limited opportunity cost. Unlike a full-time MBA student, a part-time one does not miss out on two years of salary (and, in some cases, retirement savings) and can still earn raises and promotions while completing his/her studies. Furthermore, firm sponsorship seems to be more prevalent for part-time MBAs, so candidates who have this option can truly come out ahead, with a free education and continued earning throughout. Beyond the financial rationale, many part-time MBA students see an academic advantage; they can learn both in the classroom and at work and can then turn theory into practice (and vice versa) in real time, on an ongoing basis. Of course, a cynic might add that another pro is that part-time MBA programs are generally less selective. So, a candidate who may have had difficulty getting accepted to a traditional two-year program may have a better chance of g aining admission to a well-regarded school in its part-time program instead. As for the cons, many part-time MBA candidates feel that the comparative lack of structure means that networking opportunities within the class are limited. While one part-time student could complete a school’s MBA program in two years, another might complete it in five. As a result, with candidates progressing through the program at such different paces, students will not likely see each other regularly in the same classes or at social events. In addition, in a traditional MBA environment, academics always come first; in a part-time environment, work typically comes first, and academics must come second or even third, after family. In other words, the full-time program generally involves greater intensity with regard to the classroom experience, given that it is the focal point of students’ lives. Another thing to consider is that some MBA programs do not offer their “star” faculty to part-time studentsâ€"something that candidates should definitely ask about before enrolling â€"and offer limited access to on-grounds recruiting. Of course, we are not trying to offer a definitive “answer” or present a bias for a particular kind of program; we are simply sharing some objective facts for candidates to consider as they make informed choices for themselves. MBA candidates looking to broaden their business school choices could also consider European programs. Although many applicants who are competing for places at the top U.S. business schools are well aware of the strengths of the MBA programs at INSEAD and London Business School, even more options are available beyond these two, including  IESE,  ESADE,  Oxford (Said), and  Cambridge (Judge). These four schools in particular have been aggressively playing “catch-up” with their better-known brethren by raising funds and dedicating them to scholarships and to enhancing their global brands. Other candidates may also be aware that  IMD  offers a boutique MBA program with remarkable international diversity, highly regarded academics, and a strong reputation with international employers. So, numerous options are available, and each can be explored on its own academic merit. But is earning your MBA in Europe, in itself, a good choice for you? For many applicants, the key issue is where they would like to be  after  completing their education. If you hope to work in Europe, these schools clearly offer an advantage over all but the top five or six U.S. schoolsâ€"Harvard Business School, for example, can probably open as many doors in Europe as INSEAD can. However, if you hope to work in the States, the European schools will not provide the pipeline of opportunities that a top-ranked American school could, particularly for candidates who are targeting a niche industry or a company that is not a well-known international brand. Still, beyond the employment picture, studying abroad offers intrinsic value. Spending two years in London, Fontainebleau, or Lausanne could certainly be its own reward. For more information on various international business schools, including INSEAD, Cambridge Judge, and IMD, check out our free  mbaMission Program Primers. Share ThisTweet International Business Schools Blog Archive Consider a Part-Time MBAâ€"or an MBA Program in Europe! We at mbaMission often receive questions about part-time MBA programs, so we thought we should offer a look at some of the pros and cons of this option. As for the pros, the one that business school candidates cite most frequently is that the part-time MBA involves a limited opportunity cost. Unlike full-time MBA students, part-time ones do not miss out on two years of salary (and, in some cases, retirement savings) and can still earn raises and promotions while completing their studies. Furthermore, firm sponsorship seems to be more prevalent for part-time MBAs, so candidates who have this option can truly come out ahead, with a free education and continued earning throughout. Beyond the financial rationale, many part-time MBA students see an academic advantage; they can learn both in the classroom and at work and can then turn theory into practice (and vice versa) in real time, on an ongoing basis. Of course, a cynic might add that another pro is that part-time MBA programs are generally less selective. So, a candidate who may have had difficulty getting accepted to a traditional two-year program may have a better chance of gaining admission to a well-regarded school in its part-time program instead. As for the cons, many part-time MBA candidates feel that the comparative lack of structure means that networking opportunities within the class are limited. While one part-time student could complete a school’s MBA program in two years, another might complete it in five. As a result, with candidates progressing through the program at such different paces, students will not likely see each other regularly in the same classes or at social events. In addition, in a traditional MBA environment, academics always come first; in a part-time environment, work typically comes first, and academics must come second or even third, after family. In other words, the full-time program generally involves greater intensity with regard to the classroom experience, given that it is the focal point of students’ lives. Another thing to consider is that some MBA programs do not offer their “star” faculty to part-time studentsâ€"something that candidates should definitely ask about before enrolling â€"and offer limited access to on-grounds recruiting. Of course, we are not trying to offer a definitive “answer” or present a bias for a particular kind of program; we are simply sharing some objective facts for candidates to consider as they make informed choices for themselves. MBA candidates looking to broaden their business school choices could also consider European programs. Although many applicants who are competing for places at the top U.S. business schools are well aware of the strengths of the MBA programs at INSEAD and London Business School, even more options are available beyond these two, including  IESE,  ESADE,  Oxford (Saïd), and  Cambridge (Judge). These four schools in particular have been aggressively playing “catch-up” with their better-known brethren by raising funds and dedicating them to scholarships and to enhancing their global brands. Other candidates may also be aware that  IMD offers a boutique MBA program with remarkable international diversity, highly regarded academics, and a strong reputation with international employers. So, numerous options are available, and each can be explored on its own academic merit. But is earning your MBA in Europe, in itself, a good choice for you? For many applicants, the key issue is where they would like to be  after completing their education. If you hope to work in Europe, these schools clearly offer an advantage over all but the top five or six U.S. schoolsâ€"Harvard Business School, for example, can probably open as many doors in Europe as INSEAD can. However, if you hope to work in the States, the European schools will not provide the pipeline of opportunities that a top-ranked American school could, particularly for candidates who are targeting a niche industry or a company that is not a well-known international brand. Still, beyond the employment picture, studying abroad offers intrinsic value. Spending two years in London, Fontainebleau, or Lausanne could certainly be its own reward. For more information on various international business schools, including INSEAD, Cambridge Judge, and IMD, check out our free  mbaMission International Program Guides. Share ThisTweet Application Tips International Business Schools